Further topics of interest

<2014-01-08>This chapter will provide a selection of resources related to the following topics

Total votes: 1431

Stakeholder involvement

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-11

This division presents a selection of publications on stakeholder involvement in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Regarding the stakeholders "patients" and "public / consumer" separate publication listings are introduced. Please feel free to visit the additional publication listings on
Patient involvement and preferences
Public / consumer involvement

  1. Cavazza M, Jommi C. Stakeholders involvement by HTA organisations: Why is so different? Health Policy 2012; 105(2-3): 236-245. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  2. Cicchetti A, Iacopino V, Carletto A, Marchetti M, Mennini FS. Il ruolo degli stakeholder nel processo di HTA. G Ital Health Technol Assess 2011; 4(2): 69-77. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  3. Flipse SM, van der Sanden MC, Osseweijer P. Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences. Sci Eng Ethics 2014; 20(1): 7-22. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  4. Frønsdal K1, Pichler F, Mardhani-Bayne L, Henshall C, Røttingen JA, Mørland B, Klemp M. Interaction initiatives between regulatory, health technology assessment and coverage bodies, and industry. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28(4): 374-381. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  5. Hao Y, Thomas A. Health technology assessment and comparative effectiveness research: A pharmaceutical industry perspective. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2013; 13(4): 447-54. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  6. Health Information and Quality Authority. Guidelines for Stakeholder Engagement in Health Technology Assessment in Ireland. Dublin: HIQA; 2014. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  7. Heath I. View of health technology assessment from the swampy lowlands of general practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004; 20(1): 81-86. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  8. Hivon M, Lehoux P, Denis JL, Tailliez S. Use of health technology assessment in decision making: coresponsibility of users and producers? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21(2): 268-275. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  9. Lehoux P, Hivon M, Denis JL, Tailliez S. What medical specialists like and dislike about health technology assessment reports. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009; 14(4): 197-203. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  10. Leung MY, Halpern MT, West ND. Pharmaceutical technology assessment: Perspectives from payers. J Manag Care Pharm 2012; 18(3): 256-264. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  11. Lothgren M, Ratcliffe M. Pharmaceutical industry's perspective on health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004; 20(1): 97-101. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  12. McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21(2): 263-267. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  13. Nielsen CP, Lauritsen SW, Kristensen FB, Bistrup ML, Cecchetti A, Turk E, et al. Involving stakeholders and developing a policy for stakeholder involvement in the European network for health technology assessment, EUnetHTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009; 25(Suppl 2): 84-91. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  14. Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, Oxman AD. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63(6): 607-619. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  15. Schubert F. Health technology assessment: The pharmaceutical industry perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18(2): 184-191. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  16. Watkins JB. Payer perspectives on health technology assessment. J Manag Care Pharm 2012; 18(3): 265-267. [Further reference details] [Full text]
Total votes: 1463

Patient involvement and preferences

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-10

Patient and citzens involvement is represented by an HTAi Interest Sub-Group. Please feel free to visit the web page of the HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA (PCISG).

This sub-dividion presents a selection of methodological publications on patient involvement and preferences in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). For publications on the broader topics of public / consumer involvement or stakeholder involvement in HTA please feel free to visit the public / consumer involvement and stakeholder involvement listings.

  1. Atkinson MJ, Lohs J, Kuhagen I, Kaufman J, Bhaidani S. A promising method for identifying cross-cultural differences in patient perspective: The use of Internet-based focus groups for content validation of new patient reported outcome assessments. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 64. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  2. Bastian H, Scheibler F, Knelangen M, Zschorlich B, Nasser M, Waltering A. Choosing health technology assessment and systematic review topics: The development of priority-setting criteria for patients' and consumers' interests. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(4): 348-356. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  3. Brettschneider C, Luehmann D, Raspe H. Informative value of Patient -Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA ). GMS Health Technology Assessment 2011; 7: 1-15. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  4. Bridges JFP, Jones C. Patient based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23: 30-35. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  5. Brooker AS, Carcone S, Witteman W, Krahn M. Quantitative patient preference evidence for health technology assessment: A case study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29(3): 290-300. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  6. Christiaens W, Kohn L, Léonard C, Denis A, Daue F, Cleemput I. Models for citizen and patient involvement in health care policy: Part I. Exploration of their feasibility and acceptability. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2013. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  7. Coulter A. Engaging patients in their healthcare: How is the UK doing relative to other countries? Oxford: Picker Institute; 2006. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  8. Coulter A. Perspectives on health technology assessment: Response from the patient's perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004; 20(1): 92-96. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  9. Danner M, Hummel JM, Volz F, vanManen JG, Wiegard B, Dintsios CM, et al. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(4): 369-375. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  10. Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, Hansen HP, Lo Scalzo A, Mossman J, et al. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010; 26(3): 334-340. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  11. Fattal J, Lehoux P. Health technology assessment use and dissemination by patient and consumer groups: Why and how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24(4): 473-480. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  12. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, et al. Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(1): 31-42. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  13. Gagnon MP, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Simard C, Rhainds M, et al. Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 27; 9: 54. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  14. Jacobsen CB, Pedersen VH, Albeck K. Patient involvement between ideals and reality: An empirical study of shared decision making and ordinary encounters between patients, doctors and nurses. Copenhagen: National Board of Health, Monitoring & Health Technology Assessment; 2008. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  15. Lee A, Skött LS, Hansen HP. Organizational and patient-related assessments in HTAs: State of the art. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009; 25(4): 530-536. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  16. Lee A, Seest Sinding L. A review of organisational and patient-related assessments in HTAs published by INAHTA members. Copenhagen: Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment (DACEHTA); 2007. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  17. Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Pakenham C, Burgers J, Légaré J, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: A knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making 2011; 31(6): E45-E74.  [Further reference details] [Full text]

  18. Menon D, Stafinski T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11(1): 75-89. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  19. Sampietro-Colom L, Phillips V, Hutchinson A. Eliciting women’s preferences in health care: A review of the literature. Int J Technol Assess in Health Care 2004; 20: 145-155. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  20. Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Hansen HP. Knowledge in health technology assessment: Who, what, how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(4): 324-329. [Further reference details] [Full text]
Total votes: 1703

Public / consumer involvement

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-10

Patient and citzens involvement is represented by an HTAi Interest Sub-Group. Please feel free to visit the web page of the HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Patient and Citizen Involvement in HTA (PCISG).

This sub-dicision presents a selection of publications on public resp. consumer resp. citizen involvement in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). For publications on the topics of patient involvement and preferences or stakeholder involvement in HTA please feel free to visit the patient involvement and preferences and stakeholder involvement listings.

  1. Abelson J, Bombard Y, Gauvin FP, Simeonov D, Boesveld S. Assessing the impacts of citizen deliberations on the health technology process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29(3): 282-289. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  2. Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice. Health Policy 2007; 82(1): 37-50. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  3. Bastian H, Scheibler F, Knelangen M, Zschorlich B, Nasser M, Waltering A. Choosing health technology assessment and systematic review topics: the development of priority-setting criteria for patients' and consumers' interests. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011; 27(4): 348-356. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  4. Buxton MJ, Chambers JD. What values do the public want their health care systems to use in evaluating technologies? Eur J Health Econ 2011; 12(4): 285-288. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  5. Fattal J, Lehoux P. Health technology assessment use and dissemination by patient and consumer groups: Why and how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24(4): 473-480. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  6. Freile-Gutiérrez B. Participacion ciudadana en el contexto de la evaluacion de tecnologias sanitarias. Rev Med Chil 2014; 142 Suppl 1: 27-32. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  7. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, et al. Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(1): 31-42. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  8. Gauvin FP, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN. "It all depends": Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70(10): 1518-1526. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  9. Gauvin FP, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN. Moving cautiously: Public involvement and the health technology assessment community. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(1): 43-49. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  10. Gauvin FP. Public involvement in health technology assessment agencies: A comparative analysis of Canada, Denmark, and the United Kingdom [Thesis]. Hamilton: McMaster University; 2008. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  11. Hailey D. Consumer involvement in health technology assessment. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR); 2005. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  12. Hailey D, Nordwall M. Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006; 22(4): 497-499. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  13. Hailey D, Werkö S, Bakri R, Cameron A, Göhlen B, Myles S, et al. Involvement of consumers in the HTA activities of INAHTA members: Report on a survey. Melbourne: International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA); 2011. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  14. Hailey D, Werkö S, Bakri R, Cameron A, Göhlen B, Myles S. Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by INAHTA agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29(1): 79-83. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  15. Kreis J, Schmidt H. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law 2013; 38(1): 89-122.[Further reference details] [Full text]

  16. Menon D, Stafinski T. Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: Findings from a citizens' jury. Health Expect 2008; 11(3): 282-293. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  17. Menon D, Stafinski T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11(1): 75-89. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  18. Messina J, Grainger DL. A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines. Patient 2012; 5(3): 199-211. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  19. Royle J, Oliver S. Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004; 20(4): 493-497. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  20. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27(4): 391-399. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  21. Street JM, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Facey K, Ashcroft RE, Hiller JE. Virtual community consultation? Using the literature and weblogs to link community perspectives and health technology assessment. Health Expect 2008; 11(2): 189-200. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  22. Whitty JA. An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health 2013; 16(1): 155-163. [Further reference details] [Full text]
Total votes: 1415

HTA and policy

<2014-01-08> This chapter will provide a selection of Web resources related to HTA and policy
Total votes: 1387

Conditional Coverage/Access

Last revised: 
2014-02-16

Conditional coverage and evidence development in HTA is represented by an HTAi Interest Sub-Group. Please feel free to visit the web page of the HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Conditional Coverage and Evidence Development for Promising Technologies.

<2014-01-08>This chapter will provide a selection of resources related to Conditional Coverage/Access

Total votes: 1624

Disinvestment

Last revised: 
2014-02-16

Disinvestment and HTA is represented by an HTAi Interest Sub-Group. Please feel free to visit the web page of the HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Disinvestment of Obsolete or Low Added Value Health Technologies.

<2014-01-08>This chapter will provide a selection of resources related to Disinvestment

Total votes: 1561

HTA and settings

Total votes: 1412

Hospital-based HTA

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-10

Hospital-based HTA is represented by an HTAi Interest Sub-Group. Please feel free to visit the web page of the HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Hospital Based HTA.

This sub-division presents a selection of methodological publications on hospital-based Health Technology Assessment:

  1. Attieh R, Gagnon MP. Implementation of local/hospital-based health technology assessment initiatives in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28(4): 445-451. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  2. Battista RN, Déry V, Jacob R, Jacob R, Lance JM, Lavoie R, et al. L’évaluation des technologies et des modes d’intervention en santé dans les hôpitaux universitaires. Montréal: AETMIS; 2003. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  3. Boudard A, Martelli N, Prognon P, Pineau J. Clinical studies of innovative medical devices: what level of evidence for hospital-based health technology assessment? J Eval Clin Pract 2013; 19(4): 697-702. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  4. Cicchetti A. Strategic planning in healthcare organizations: The role of health technology assessment. In: Geisler E, Krabbendam K, Schuring R (ed). Technology, healthcare and management in the hospital of the future. Westport: Praeger; 2003: 67-80. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  5. Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment. Introduction to mini-HTA: A management and decision support tool for the hospital service. Copenhagen: DACEHTA; 2005. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  6. Dopson S, Fitzgerald L. Knowledge to action? Evidence based health care in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  7. Ehlers L, Vestergaard M, Kidholm K, Bonnevie B, Pedersen PH, Jørgensen T, et al. Doing mini–health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006; 22(3): 295-301. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  8. Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Gauvin FP, Rhainds M, et al. Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. Health Expect 2012; Oct 10. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  9. Gagnon MP. Opportunities to promote efficiency in hospital decision-making through the use of health technology assessment. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2011. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  10. Hospital based Health Technology Assessment Sub-Interest Group, Health Technology Assessment international. Hospital based health technology assessment: World-wide survey. HTAi; no year. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  11. Knies S, Lombardi G, Commers M, Dauben HP, Evers S, Michelsen K. Supporting decision making in cross-border regions: A health technology assessment tool for hospitals. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29(1): 71-78. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  12. Luce BR, Brown RE. The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995; 11(1): 79-92. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  13. McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21(2): 263-267. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  14. Menon D, Marshall D. Technology assessment in teaching hospitals. Dimens Health Serv 1990; 67: 123-132. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  15. Sampietro-Colom L, Morilla-Bachs I, Gutierrez-Moreno S, Gallo P. Development and test of a decision support tool for hospital health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28(4): 460-465. [Further reference details] [Full text]

  16. Uphoff ME, Krane D. Hospital based technology assessment: Essential questions and an operational model. Public Productiv Manage Rev 1998; 22(1): 60-70. [Further reference details] [Full text]
Total votes: 1708

HTA in developing countries

Last revised: 
2014-02-16

HTA in developing countries is represented by an HTAi Interest Sub-Group. Please feel free to visit the web page of the HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Developing Countries (HTAi DC ISG).

<2014-01-08>This chapter will provide a selection of resources related to HTA in developing countries

Total votes: 1563

Countries' facts

Under this chapter, you will find a selection of references and resources per country.
Total votes: 1455

About Austria

References: 

Web Article

Austria - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2013. Abstract
Austria - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Book

Hofmarcher MM, Rack HM. Austria: Health system review. Vol 8 (3). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006.

Journal Article

Wild C. Health technology assessment in Austria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):303-24. Abstract
See Also
Total votes: 1757

About Belgium

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-06
References: 

Journal Article

Book

Gerkens S, Merkur S. Belgium: Health system review. Vol 12-5. Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2010. Abstract

Web Article

Belgium - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Belgium - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.
See Also
Total votes: 1628

About Brazil

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Total votes: 1279

About Canada

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Web Article

Canada - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Canada - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.

Book

Marchildon GP. Canada: Health system review. Vol 15 (1). Sagan A, Thomson S, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013. Abstract

Report

Total votes: 1415

About Croatia

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-06
References: 

Web Article

Croatia - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Croatia - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.

Journal Article

Book

Voncina L, Jemiai N, Merkur S, Golna C, Maeda A, Chao S, et al. Croatia: Health system review. Vol 8 (7). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006. Abstract
See Also
Total votes: 1458

About Denmark

References: 

Journal Article

Web Article

Denmark - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014.
Denmark - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.

Book

Report

See Also

Total votes: 1484

About Finland

Author(s): 
Last revised: 
2014-06-06
References: 

See also

Total votes: 1453

About France

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Book

Web Article

France - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
France - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Report

See also

Total votes: 1163

About Germany

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Gerhardus A. [The role of HTA in German health care. Do we need impact objectives?]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006;49(3):233-40. Abstract

Book

Busse R, Riesberg A. Health care systems in transition: Germany. Vol 6 (9). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2004. Abstract

Web Article

Germany - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Germany - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Report

Total votes: 1066

About Hungary

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 
Total votes: 1148

About Italy

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

France G. Health technology assessment in Italy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):459-74. Abstract

Web Article

Italy - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Italy - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Book

Report

Total votes: 1033

About Lithuania

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Book

Health Care Systems in Transition: Lithuania. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2000.

Web Article

Lithuania - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Lithuania - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) City Paris; 2014. Abstract
Total votes: 1317

About Malaysia

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Web Article

Malaysia - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Malaysia - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.

Journal Article

Sivalal S. Health technology assessment in Malaysia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:224-30. Abstract
Total votes: 1015

About Mexico

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 
Total votes: 1147

About Netherlands

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Web Article

Netherlands - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Netherlands - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Book

Report

Total votes: 927

About Poland

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Web Article

Poland - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Poland - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Journal Article

Book

Panteli D, Sagan A. Poland : Health system review. Vol 13 (8). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011. Abstract
Total votes: 977

About South Africa

Last revised: 
2014-06-08
References: 

Web Article

South Africa - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
South Africa - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. 2013-02 ed. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2013.

Journal Article

Total votes: 921

About Spain

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Book

Web Article

Spain - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Spain - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract
Total votes: 1003

About Sweden

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Book

Journal Article

Jonsson E. History of health technology assessment in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:42-52.

Web Article

Sweden - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Sweden - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Report

Total votes: 948

About Switzerland

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Book

Web Article

Switzerland - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Switzerland - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Report

Total votes: 989

About Taiwan

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Total votes: 1005

About United Kingdom

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Book

Web Article

United Kingdom - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
United Kingdom - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Report

Total votes: 835

About United States of America

Last revised: 
2014-06-16
References: 

Journal Article

Web Article

United States - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
United States - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract

Report

Total votes: 1038