Titlesort icon Related Chapters
Appraisal of: Golder S, Wright K, Rodgers M. The contribution of different information sources to identify adverse effects of a medical device: a case study using a systematic review of spinal fusion. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(14):1-7.
Appraisal of: Golder S, Wright K, Rodgers M. Failure or success of search strategies to identify adverse effects of medical devices: a feasibility study using a systematic review. Syst Rev 2014;3:113.
Appraisal of: Golder S. Optimising the retrieval of information on adverse drug effects. Health Info Libr J. 2013 Dec;30(4):327-331.
Appraisal of: Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005; 331(7524): 1064-1065. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Hinde S, Spackman E, Claxton K, Sculpher M J. The cost-effectiveness threshold: the results of a novel literature review method. Value in Health 2011;14:A354. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Hinde S, Spackman E. Bidirectional citation searching to completion: an exploration of literature searching methods. Pharmacoeconomics 2015; 33(1): 5-11. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lefebvre C, Scherer R. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2): MR000001. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Horsley, T.; Dingwall, O.; Tetzlaff, J. M.; Sampson, M. Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):MR000026. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Kahn TJ, Ninomiya H. Changing vocabularies: A guide to help bioethics searchers find relevant literature in National Library of Medicine databases using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) indexing vocabulary. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2003; 13
Appraisal of: Karimi S, Pohl S, Scholer F, Cavedon L, Zobel J. Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10(1):58. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Kaunelis D. When everything is too much: development of a CADTH narrow economic search filter. Poster presented at: 2011 CADTH Symposium. 2011 Apr 3-5; Vancouver, BC. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Levay P, Ainsworth N, Kettle R, Morgan A. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar. Res Synth Methods. 2016;7:34-45. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Linder SK, Kamath GR, Pratt GF, Saraykar SS, Volk RJ. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(4):412-417. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Lowe J, Peters J, Shields B, Cooper C. Methods to update systematic literature searches: full update searching vs. forward citation chasing; a case study from a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy [poster]. University of Exeter Medical Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Mathes T, Walgenbach M, Antoine SL, Pieper D, Eikermann M. Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature. Med Decis Making. 2014 Oct;34(7):826-40.
Appraisal of: Mattioli S, Farioli A, Cooke RMT, Baldasseroni A, Ruotsalainen J, Placidi D, et al. Hidden effectiveness? Results of hand-searching Italian language journals for occupational health interventions. Occup Environ Med 2012;69(7):522-524. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: McKinlay RJ, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Hedges Team. Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:67. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Meier BM, Cabrera OA, Ayala A, Gostin LO. Bridging international law and rights-based litigation: Mapping health-related rights through the development of the Global Health and Human Rights Database. Health Hum Rights 2012;14(1):20-35. Legal aspects
Appraisal of: National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature, National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics (Ed). Bioethics searcher’s guide to online information resources. Washington, DC: Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown Universi
Appraisal of: Nixon J, Duffy S, Armstrong N, Craig D, Glanville J, Christie J, Drummond M, Kleijnen J. The usefulness of the NHS Economic Evaluation Database to researchers undertaking technology assessment reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004; Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: O'Leary N, Tiernan E, Walsh D, Lucey N, Kirkova J, Davis MP. The pitfalls of a systematic MEDLINE review in palliative medicine: symptom assessment instruments. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007; 24(3): 181-184. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Paisley S. Identification of evidence for key parameters in decision-analytic models of cost effectiveness: a description of sources and a recommended minimum search requirement [epub]. PharmacoEconomics. 2016. DOI 10.1007/s40273-015-0372-x
Appraisal of: Papaioannou D, Brazier J, Paisley S. Systematic searching and selection of health state utility values from the literature. Value Health 2013;16(4):686-695. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Info Lib J. 2010; 27(2): 114-122. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Petrova M, Sutcliffe P, Fulford KW, Dale J. Search terms and a validated brief search filter to retrieve publications on health-related values in Medline: A word frequency analysis study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19(3): 479–488.