Titlesort icon Related Chapters
Appraisal of: Pitt C, Goodman C, Hanson K. Economic evaluation in global perspective: a bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Health Econ. 2016 Feb;25 Suppl 1:9-28. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Pohl, S. Boolean and Ranked Information Retrieval for Biomedical Systematic Reviewing [thesis]. Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering: University of Melbourne; 2012. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Rauprich O, Nolte M, Vollmann J. Systematische Literaturrecherchen in den Datenbanken PubMed® und BELIT: Ein Werkstattbericht. Ethik Med 2010; 22(1): 59–67.
Appraisal of: Rosen A B, Greenberg D, Stone P W, Olchanski N V, Neumann P J. Quality of abstracts of papers reporting original cost-effectiveness analyses. Medical Decision Making 2005;25:424-428. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Royle P, Waugh N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used inhealth technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(34). Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE et al. Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61(8): 755-762. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Sampson M, Zhang L, Morrison A, Barrowman NJ, Clifford TJ, Platt RW, et al. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(33)
Appraisal of: Sampson M. Updating searches for systematic reviews [dissertation]. Department of Information Studies: University of Aberystwyth; 2009. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Shannon M. Sullivan, Kate Tsiplova & Wendy J. Ungar. A scoping review of pediatric economic evaluation 1980-2014: do trends over time reflect changing priorities in evaluation methods and childhood disease? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes R
Appraisal of: Shemilt I, Mugford M, Vale L, Craig D. Searching NHS EED and HEED to inform development of economic commentary for Cochrane intervention reviews. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Thielen FW, Van Mastrigt G, Burgers LT, Bramer WM, Majoie H, Evers S, Kleijnen J. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3). Exp
Appraisal of: van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67(11): 1192-1199. Diagnostic accuracy
Appraisal of: Waffenschmidt S, Hausner E, Engel L, Volz F, Kaiser T. Benefit of searching different databases to identify health economic evaluations in German HTA-reports. Abstract presented at: Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) 7th Annua Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Waffenschmidt S, Janzen T, Hausner E, Kaiser T. Simple search techniques in PubMed are potentially suitable for evaluating the completeness of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66(6):660-665. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Westphal A, Kriston L, Holzel LP, Harter M, von Wolff A. Efficiency and contribution of strategies for finding randomized controlled trials: a case study from a systematic review on therapeutic interventions of chronic depression. J Public H Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Wieseler B, Wolfram N, McGauran N et al. Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data. PLoS Med 2013;10(10):e1001526. Safety
Appraisal of: Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jun 21;5:20.
Appraisal of: Wood H, Arber M, Glanville JM. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: how extensive are their searches? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Mar 27:1-7.
Appraisal of: Wood H, Arber, M, Glanville J. Information resources used in published systematic reviews of economic evaluations [poster].
Appraisal of: Wright K, Golder S, Rodriguez-Lopez R. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:73. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Zechmeister-Koss I, Schnell-Inderst P, Zauner G. Appropriate evidence sources for populating decision analytic models within health technology assessment (HTA): a systematic review of HTA manuals and health economic guidelines. Med Decis Mak Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: “Atkinson KM, Koenka AC, Sanchez CE, Moshontz H, Cooper H. Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Res Synth Method. 2015(1):87.” Documenting and reporting the search process
Appraisal of: “Booth AC. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94:421-9, e205.” Documenting and reporting the search process
Appraisal of: “Finfgeld-Connett D, Johnson ED. Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(1):194-204.” Documenting and reporting the search process
Appraisal of: “Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL. Reproducibility of Literature Search Reporting in Medical Education Reviews. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):1049-54.” Documenting and reporting the search process