Bibliography
PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-6. Abstract
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9, W64.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross-sectional sample. Res Synth Methods. 2011;2(2):119-25. Abstract
A pragmatic critical appraisal instrument for search filters: introducing the CADTH CAI. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(3):211-9. Abstract
Population access to new vaccines in European countries. Vaccine. 2013;31(27):2862-7. Abstract
Populating decision-analytic models: the feasibility and efficiency of database searching for individual parameters. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):305-11. Abstract
Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):440-8. Abstract
The politics of health technology assessment in Poland. Health Policy. 2012;108(2-3):178-93. Abstract
Poland : Health system review. Vol 13 (8). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011. Abstract
Poland - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract
Poland - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
POEMs (“Patient-Oriented Evidence that Matters”) Research Summaries. John Wiley & Sons; 2005. Abstract
The pitfalls of a systematic MEDLINE review in palliative medicine: symptom assessment instruments. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(3):181-4. Abstract
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):579. Abstract
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579. Abstract
PHP117 The Cost-Effectiveness Threshold: The Results of A Novel Literature Review Method. Value in Health. 2011;14(7):A354.
PERFORMANCE OF OVID MEDLINE SEARCH FILTERS TO IDENTIFY HEALTH STATE UTILITY STUDIES. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(4):472-80. Abstract
The performance of adverse effects search filters in medline and embase. Health Info Libr J. 2012;29(2):141-51. Abstract
Peer Review of Search Strategies. Methods Research Report. (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-100572.) . AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC068-EF ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.