Bibliography

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
R
Report from the Technology Assessment Unit of the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12(4):766-8.
Niederstadt C, Droste S. Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: the need for optimizing common practice in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(4):450-7. Abstract
Harbour J, Fraser C, Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Beale S, Boachie C, et al. Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2014;31(3):176-94. Abstract
Atkinson KM, Koenka AC, Sanchez CE, Moshontz H, Cooper H. Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Res Synth Methods. 2015;6(1):87-95. Abstract
Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL. Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews. Acad Med. 2011;86(8):1049-54. Abstract
Gallego G, van Gool K, Kelleher D. Resource allocation and health technology assessment in Australia: views from the local level. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(2):134-40. Abstract
Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S. Response to letter by Boeker et al. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: further issues regarding the objective and conceptual approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:253-5.
Jovell AJ. Response: I know how you think, so I can help. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):402-3.
Dakin H, Abel L, Burns R, Yang Y. Review and critical appraisal of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database and application of the MAPS statement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):31. Abstract
Jensen RE, Snyder CF, Abernethy AP, Basch E, Potosky AL, Roberts AC, et al. Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(4):e215-22. Abstract
Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, McDonald C, Kearney N. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):21-33. Abstract
Dakin H. Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11(1):151. Abstract
Cooper C, Dawson S, Peters J, Varley-Campbell J, Cockcroft E, Hendon J, et al. Revisiting the need for a literature search narrative: A brief methodological note. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(3):361-5. Abstract
Smith CS, Hailey D, Drummond M. The role of economic appraisal in health technology assessment: the Australian case. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(12):1653-62. Abstract
Decker M. The Role of Ethics in Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis. 2004;2:139-56. Abstract
Stolk EA, de Bont A, van Halteren AR, Bijlmer RJ, Poley MJ. Role of health technology assessment in shaping the benefits package in The Netherlands. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009;9(1):85-94. Abstract
Kolasa K, Kalo Z, Zah V, Dolezal T. Role of health technology assessment in the process of implementation of the EU Transparency Directive: relevant experience from Central Eastern European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(3):283-7. Abstract
Menon D, Stafinski T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(1):75-89. Abstract
Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S, Kaiser T, Simon M. Routine development of objectively derived search strategies. Syst Rev. 2012;1:19. Abstract
Davies SR. The rules of engagement: Power and interaction in dialogue events. Public Underst Sci. 2013;22(1):65-79. Abstract
S
Sullivan SM, Tsiplova K, Ungar WJ. A scoping review of pediatric economic evaluation 1980-2014: do trends over time reflect changing priorities in evaluation methods and childhood disease? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(5):599-607. Abstract
Geersing {G, Bouwmeester W, Zuithoff P, Spijker R, Leeflang M, Moons K. Search filters for finding prognostic and diagnostic prediction studies in medline to enhance systematic reviews. {PloS} One. 2012;7:e32844. Abstract
Search Standards and Guidelines Evidence (SAGE). Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Corporation; 2012. Abstract
Wilczynski NL, Marks S, Haynes BR. Search strategies for identifying qualitative studies in CINAHL. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(5):705-10. Abstract
Faggion CM, Atieh MA, Park S. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(9):883-8. Abstract