Bibliography

C
Cooper C, Booth A, Britten N, Garside R. A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):234. Abstract
Cooper C, Booth A, Britten N, Garside R. A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: a methodological review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):234. Abstract
Nasser M, Al Hajeri A. A comparison of handsearching versus embase searching of the archives of Iranian medicine to identify reports of randomized controlled trials. Arch Iran Med. 2006;9(3):192-5.
Papanikolaou PN, Christidi GD, Ioannidis JP. Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ. 2006;174(5):635-41. Abstract
Clemens S, Begum N, Harper C, Whitty JA, Scuffham PA. A comparison of EQ-5D-3L population norms in Queensland, Australia, estimated using utility value sets from Australia, the UK and USA. Qual Life Res. 2014. Abstract
Allison MM. Comparison of CINAHL® via EBSCOhost®, Ovid®, and ProQuest®. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries. 2006;3:31-50.
Kenyon L, Gordon F. Community engagement: from a professional to a public perspective. Community Pract. 2009;82(2):22-5. Abstract
Nicod E, Kanavos P. Commonalities and differences in HTA outcomes: a comparative analysis of five countries and implications for coverage decisions. Health Policy. 2012;108(2-3):167-77. Abstract
Harris JL, Booth A, Cargo M, Hannes K, Harden A, Flemming K, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:39-48. Abstract
Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 ed. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Abstract
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group reviews. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group; Submitted. Abstract
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Tovey D, editor. John Wiley & Sons; 1995. Abstract
Collaboration; C. The Cochrane Collaboration Glossary. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2012.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2012. Abstract
McDaid D. Co-ordinating health technology assessment in Canada: a European perspective. Health Policy. 2003;63(2):205-13. Abstract
CMA Infobase: Clinical Practice Guidelines Database (CPGs). Canadian Medical Association (CMA); 1995.
Greiner B, Corcoran A, Wheeler D. Clinical trial registry searches are under-utilized in systematic reviews from critical care journals: A bibliometric analysis. J Crit Care. 2020. Abstract
Clinical Evidence. BMJ Publishing Group; 1999. Abstract
Bombard Y, Abelson J, Simeonov D, Gauvin F-. Citizens' perspectives on personalized medicine: a qualitative public deliberation study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(11):1197-201. Abstract
Wright K, Golder S, Rodriguez-Lopez R. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:73. Abstract
Linder SK, Kamath GR, Pratt GF, Saraykar SS, Volk RJ. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):412-7. Abstract
Robinson KA, Dunn AG, Tsafnat G, Glasziou P. Citation networks of related trials are often disconnected: implications for bidirectional citation searches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(7):793-9. Abstract
Belter CW. Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews. J Assn Inf Sci Tec. 2016;67.
Idänpään-Heikkilä JE, Fluss S. The CIOMS view on the use of placebo in clinical trials. Sci Eng Ethics. 2004;10(1):23-8. Abstract
Bethel A, Rogers M. Choosing the right databases and the right search techniques. In: Levay P, Craven J, editors. Systematic searching: practical ideas for improving results. London: Facet Publishing; 2019.