Bibliography

S
Strech D, Synofzik M, Marckmann G. Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(6):472-7. Abstract
Wood H, Arber M, Glanville JM. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: how extensive are their searches? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017:1-7. Abstract
Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. Abstract
McDougall R. Systematic reviews in bioethics: types, challenges, and value. J Med Philos. 2014;39(1):89-97. Abstract
Kmet L, Lee RC, Cook LS, Lorenzetti D, Godlovitch G, Einsiedel E. Systematic Review of the Social, Ethical, and Legal Dimensions of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment Technologies. Edmonton: AHFMR; 2004.
Basch E. Systematic collection of patient-reported adverse drug reactions: a path to patient-centred pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(4):277-8.
Booth A, Papaioannou D, Sutton A. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012.
Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports.. 2007.
Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45-53. Abstract
Switzerland : Health care systems in transition. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2000. Abstract
Switzerland - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract
Switzerland - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Bloom BS, Banta HD, Gross PF, Peña-Mohr J, Sisk JE, Stocking B. The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(1):154-8. Abstract
Anell A, Glenngård AH, Merkur S. Sweden : Health system review. Vol 14 (5). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2012. Abstract
Sweden - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract
Sweden - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Hailey D, Nordwall M. Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(4):497-9. Abstract
Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE, et al. Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(8):755-62. Abstract
Ananiadou S, Rea B, Okazaki N, Procter R, Thomas J. Supporting Systematic Reviews Using Text Mining. Social Science Computer Review. 2009;27:509-23. Abstract
Cooper C, Lovell R, Husk K, Booth A, Garside R. Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: A case study from public health and environmental enhancement. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(2):195-223. Abstract
Noyes BA, Hannes K, Harden A, Harris J, Lewin S, Lockwood C. Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group; 2011.
Badgett B. SUMSearch2. University of Kansas; 2010. Abstract
A Study of the Impact of 2001-2002 Health Technology Assessment Products. Edmonton: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2003.
Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(3):548-56. Abstract
Stocking B. Strategies for technology assessment and implementation in some European countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):19-26.