Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is H  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G [H] I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
H
Håheim LL, Mørland B, Wisløff TF, Lyngstadaas A. Six years' experience with interdisciplinary review teams in health technology assessment in Norway. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(4):526-31. Abstract
Hailey D. The history of health technology assessment in Australia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:61-7. Abstract
Hailey DM. Health technology assessment in Canada: diversity and evolution. Med J Aust. 2007;187(5):286-8. Abstract
Hailey DM. Health technology assessment in Australia: a need to re-focus. J Qual Clin Pract. 1996;16(3):123-9. Abstract
Hailey D, Werkö S, Bakri R, Cameron A, Göhlen B, Myles S, et al. Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(1):79-83. Abstract
Hailey DM, Crowe BL. Health technology assessment: an Australian perspective. Med Prog Technol. 1991;17(2):103-9. Abstract
Hailey D, Nordwall M. Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(4):497-9. Abstract
Hammerstrøm K, Wade A, Jorgensen A-. Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews.; 2010.
Hannes K, Macaitis K. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers. Qual Res. 2012;12(4).
Hansen HP, Draborg E, Børlum Kristensen F. Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making. Patient. 2011;4(3):143-52. Abstract
Hansen HP, Lee A, van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):330-6. Abstract
Harbour J, Fraser C, Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Beale S, Boachie C, et al. Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2014;31(3):176-94. Abstract
Harris JL, Booth A, Cargo M, Hannes K, Harden A, Flemming K, et al. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 2: methods for question formulation, searching, and protocol development for qualitative evidence synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;97:39-48. Abstract
Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):127. Abstract
Hausmann A, Blasco JA. Elaboración y validación de instrumentos metodológicos para la evaluación de productos de las agencias de evaluación de tecnologías sanitarias: Manual para la Evaluación Ética en la Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias. Madrid: Plan de Calidad para el SNS del MSPSI. Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, Agencia Laín Entralgo; 2010.
Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: reply to commentary by Dintsios and Niederstadt (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-199). J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:265-6.
Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S, Kaiser T, Simon M. Routine development of objectively derived search strategies. Syst Rev. 2012;1:19. Abstract
Hausner E, Guddat C, Hermanns T, Lampert U, Waffenschmidt S. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: validation showed the noninferiority of the objective approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(2):191-9. Abstract
Hausner E, Guddat C, Hermanns T, Lampert U, Waffenschmidt S. Prospective comparison of search strategies for systematic reviews: an objective approach yielded higher sensitivity than a conceptual one. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016. Abstract
Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S. Response to letter by Boeker et al. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: further issues regarding the objective and conceptual approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:253-5.
ten Have HA. UNESCO's activities in ethics. Science & Engineering Ethics. 2010;16:7-15. Abstract
ten Have H. Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):71-6. Abstract
Using economic valuation methods for environment and health assessment. Vol 2012. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Abstract
Understanding Health Technology Assessment (HTA) . Health Equality Europe (HEE) ; 2008. Abstract
Ethical guidelines for good practice in the health care professions. Pretoria: Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA); 2008. Abstract