Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is K  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J [K] L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
K
Kwon Y, Powelson SE, Wong H, Ghali WA, Conly JM. An assessment of the efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in identifying studies for a systematic review on ward closures as an infection control intervention to control outbreaks. Syst Rev. 2014;3:135. Abstract
Kushner T, Belliotti RA, Buckner D. Toward a methodology for moral decision making in medicine. Theor Med. 1991;12(4):281-93. Abstract
Kugley S, Wade A, Thomas J, Mahood Q, Klint Jørgensen A-, Hammerstrøm KT, et al. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Version 1.1 ed. Oslo: The Campbell Collaboration; 2017.
Kreis J, Schmidt H. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38(1):89-122. Abstract
Krebs K, Raghib A, Baldwin T, Brownsword R, Calman K, Godfrey C, et al. Public health ethical issues.. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2007. Abstract
Korevaar DA, Salameh J-, Vali Y, Cohen JF, McInnes MD, Spijker R, et al. Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy. Res Synth Methods. 2020. Abstract
Korevaar DA, Hooft L, Askie LM, Barbour V, Faure H, Gatsonis CA, et al. Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative. Clin Chem. 2017;63(8):1331-41.
Korevaar DA, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports. BMJ Open. 2014;4(1):e004596. Abstract
Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):708-15. Abstract
Kolasa K, Wasiak R. Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(1):70-6. Abstract
Kolasa K, Dziomdziora M, Fajutrao L. What aspects of the health technology assessment process recommended by international health technology assessment agencies received the most attention in Poland in 2008? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):84-94. Abstract
Kolasa K, Kalo Z, Zah V, Dolezal T. Role of health technology assessment in the process of implementation of the EU Transparency Directive: relevant experience from Central Eastern European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;12(3):283-7. Abstract
Kohli HS. Health technology assessment in Scotland. Natl Med J India. 2003;16(5):275-6.
Koch PW. Government reimbursement policy and medical technology assessment. The case of Switzerland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1987;3(4):607-10.
Koch P, Schilling J, Läubli M, Mitscherlich F, Melchart D, Bellucci S. Health technology assessment in Switzerland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:174-7. Abstract
Kmet L, Lee RC, Cook LS, Lorenzetti D, Godlovitch G, Einsiedel E. Systematic Review of the Social, Ethical, and Legal Dimensions of Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment Technologies. Edmonton: AHFMR; 2004.
Klemp M, Frønsdal KB, Facey K. What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):77-83. Abstract
Kenyon L, Gordon F. Community engagement: from a professional to a public perspective. Community Pract. 2009;82(2):22-5. Abstract
Kearney BJ, Blamey SL. Health technology assessment in Australia. Med J Aust. 2008;188(8):495.
Kearney B, Willis E. Health technology assessment in Australia: the role of AHTAC. Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1997;20(4):193-7. Abstract
Kaunelis D, Glanville J, Isojärvi J, Lefebvre C, Wright K, Chalon PX. Keeping up-to-date with information retrieval research: Summarized Research in Information Retrieval for HTA. In: CHLA/ABSC 2017 Annual Conference. Edmonton, Alberta (Canada); 2017.
Kaunelis D. When everything is too much: development of a CADTH narrow economic search filter. . In: 2011 CADTH Symposium. Evidence to Practice: Maximizing our Investment in Health Care. 2011 Apr 3-5; Vancouver, BC.; 2011.
Katchamart W, Faulkner A, Feldman B, Tomlinson G, Bombardier C. PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):805-7. Abstract
Kastner M, Straus SE, McKibbon AK, Goldsmith CH. The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):149-57. Abstract
Karimi S, Pohl S, Scholer F, Cavedon L, Zobel J. Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:58. Abstract