Bibliography
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is M [Clear All Filters]
Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA. 1993;269(21):2749-53. Abstract
Best Evidence Topics (BETs). Emergency Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary; 1996. Abstract
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274.
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274.
Keeping pace with new technologies: systems needed to identify and evaluate them. BMJ. 1999;319(7220):1291.
Health Care Systems in Transition: Switzerland. Dixon A, Mossialos E, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2000.
Health technology assessment in Canada. A decade in review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(3):896-902. Abstract
Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
Co-ordinating health technology assessment in Canada: a European perspective. Health Policy. 2003;63(2):205-13. Abstract
Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(4):671-84. Abstract
Evidence-based retrieval in evidence-based medicine. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004;92(2):196-9. Abstract
Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:5. Abstract
Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:5. Abstract
Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):11-24. Abstract
Overview of health technology assessment in France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):25-34. Abstract
Evaluating Health Services: A Reporter Covers the Science of Research Synthesis. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund; 2004. Abstract
An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:20. Abstract
Six years' experience with interdisciplinary review teams in health technology assessment in Norway. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(4):526-31. Abstract
Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10 Suppl 1:6-20. Abstract
Croatia: Health system review. Vol 8 (7). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006. Abstract
The HuGENet™ HuGE review handbook, version 1.0. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: HuGENet Canada Coordinating Centre; 2006.
An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33. Abstract
Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:67. Abstract
Developing optimal search strategies for retrieving qualitative studies in PsycINFO. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29(4):440-54. Abstract
Identifying systematic reviews of the adverse effects of health care interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(22). Abstract