Bibliography

Filters: Keyword is Guidelines as Topic  [Clear All Filters]
Journal Article
Yoshii A, Plaut DA, McGraw KA, Anderson MJ, Wellik KE. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):21-9. Abstract
Basch E. Beyond the FDA PRO guidance: steps toward integrating meaningful patient-reported outcomes into regulatory trials and US drug labels. Value Health. 2012;15(3):401-3.
Idänpään-Heikkilä JE, Fluss S. The CIOMS view on the use of placebo in clinical trials. Sci Eng Ethics. 2004;10(1):23-8. Abstract
Salameh J-, McInnes MD, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Frank R, et al. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline. Clin Chem. 2019;65(2):291-301. Abstract
Kolasa K, Wasiak R. Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(1):70-6. Abstract
Derry S, Loke YK, Aronson JK. Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:7. Abstract
Assasi N, Schwartz L, Tarride J-, Campbell K, Goeree R. Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(2):203-20. Abstract
Aagaard T, Lund H, Juhl C. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):161. Abstract
Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Med. 2013;11:20. Abstract
Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med. 2013;11:21. Abstract
Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Med. 2013;11:21. Abstract
Lehoux P, Tailliez S, Denis J-, Hivon M. Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: diversification of products and contextualization of findings. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):325-36. Abstract
Atkinson KM, Koenka AC, Sanchez CE, Moshontz H, Cooper H. Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Res Synth Methods. 2015;6(1):87-95. Abstract
Golder S, Loke Y. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(2):84-92. Abstract
Drummond M. Technology assessment in the German context. Eur J Health Econ. 2007;8 Suppl 1:S3.
Ang TW, ten Have H, Solbakk JH, Nys H. UNESCO Global Ethics Observatory: database on ethics related legislation and guidelines. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(10):738-41. Abstract
ten Have HA. UNESCO's activities in ethics. Science & Engineering Ethics. 2010;16:7-15. Abstract
Bitzer EM, Busse R, Kohlmann T, Lühmann D, Perleth M. [Health technology assessment in the international context: where does Germany stand? For the "German Scientific Working Group Technology Assessment for Health care"]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999;93(1):33-8. Abstract
Web Article
NICE implementation programme. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012.
SIGN 50: A guideline developer's handbook . Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2011.