Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is United States [Clear All Filters]
[SIBIL: an information tool for the information retrieval on bioethics]. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2004;40(3):283-6. Abstract
[SIBIL: an information tool for the information retrieval on bioethics]. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2004;40(3):283-6. Abstract
[Conception and conversion of medical technology assessment--an international comparison]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998;92(4):255-62. Abstract
The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(1):79-92. Abstract
United States - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract
United States - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Toward patient-centered drug development in oncology. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):397-400.
Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997;2(6):240-53. Abstract
Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25(6):1083-120. Abstract
Standards for patient-reported outcome-based performance measures. JAMA. 2013;310(2):139-40.
Stakeholder Engagement. Washington (USA): Washington State Health Care Authority ; 2014. Abstract
Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27(3):176-90. Abstract
Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):1051-7. Abstract
Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(7). Abstract
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(4):319-29. Abstract
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):30-5. Abstract
Medical innovation and the critical role of health technology assessment. JAMA. 1999;282(19):1869-72.
Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):9-16. Abstract
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(6):602-7. Abstract
Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):64-70. Abstract
The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):420-31. Abstract
Hidden effectiveness? Results of hand-searching Italian language journals for occupational health interventions. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69(7):522-4. Abstract
Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(2):192-8.
Health technology assessment in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:33-41. Abstract