Bibliography

Filters: Keyword is Middle Aged  [Clear All Filters]
[
Varela-Lema L, Merino GA, García ML, Martínez MV, Triana EG, Mota TC. [Requirements for and expectations of health technology assessment in Galicia (Spain). A qualitative study from the perspective of decision-makers and clinicians]. Gac Sanit. 2011;25(6):454-60. Abstract
U
van den Heuvel WJ, Wieringh R, van den Heuvel LP. Utilisation of medical technology assessment in health policy. Health Policy. 1997;42(3):211-22. Abstract
P
Lehoux P. Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):28. Abstract
I
Arellano LE, Willett JM, Borry P. International survey on attitudes toward ethics in health technology assessment: An exploratory study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):50-4. Abstract
H
Izquierdo F, Gracia J, Guerra M, Blasco JA, Andradas E. Health technology assessment-based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):363-8. Abstract
Faisst K, Schilling J, Koch P. Health technology assessment of three screening methods in Switzerland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(3):389-99. Abstract
Granados A, Sampietro-Colom L, Asua J, Conde J, Vazquez-Albertino R. Health technology assessment in Spain. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):532-59. Abstract
Lauslahti K, Roine R, Semberg V, Kekomäki M, Konttinen M, Karp P. Health technology assessment in Finland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):382-99. Abstract
Jørgensen T, Hvenegaard A, Kristensen FB. Health technology assessment in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):347-81. Abstract
Callahan D. Health technology assessment implementation: the politics of ethics. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(1):E13-9. Abstract
Jonsson E, Banta HD, Schersten T. Health technology assessment and screening in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(3):380-8. Abstract
Banta HD. Health policy, health technology assessment, and screening in Europe. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(3):409-17. Abstract
F
Lehoux P, Poland B, Daudelin G. Focus group research and "the patient's view". Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(8):2091-104. Abstract
Judson TJ, Bennett AV, Rogak LJ, Sit L, Barz A, Kris MG, et al. Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the Internet during routine chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(20):2580-5. Abstract
E
Engel L, Bryan S, Evers SM, Dirksen CD, Noonan VK, Whitehurst DG. Exploring psychometric properties of the SF-6D, a preference-based health-related quality of life measure, in the context of spinal cord injury. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(8):2383-93. Abstract
Bombard Y, Abelson J, Simeonov D, Gauvin F-. Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(1):135-44. Abstract
D
Böckerman P, Johansson E, Saarni SI. Do established health-related quality-of-life measures adequately capture the impact of chronic conditions on subjective well-being? Health Policy. 2011;100(1):91-5. Abstract
C
Bombard Y, Abelson J, Simeonov D, Gauvin F-. Citizens' perspectives on personalized medicine: a qualitative public deliberation study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(11):1197-201. Abstract
Braunack-Mayer A. Casuistry as bioethical method: an empirical perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(1):71-81. Abstract
Bennett DA, Latham NK, Stretton C, Anderson CS. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(4):349-57. Abstract
B
Oleen-Burkey M, Castelli-Haley J, Lage MJ, Johnson KP. Burden of a multiple sclerosis relapse: the patient's perspective. Patient. 2012;5(1):57-69. Abstract
Molster C, Maxwell S, Youngs L, Kyne G, Hope F, Dawkins H, et al. Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect. 2013;16(2):211-24. Abstract