Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic [Clear All Filters]
Use of the capture-recapture technique to evaluate the completeness of systematic literature searches. BMJ. 1996;313(7053):342-3.
Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:7. Abstract
Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7(2):125-33. Abstract
Database searches for qualitative research. J Med Libr Assoc. 2002;90(3):290-3. Abstract
Database searches for qualitative research. J Med Libr Assoc. 2002;90(3):290-3. Abstract
Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(4):349-57. Abstract
Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns? Complement Ther Med. 2004;12(4):228-32. Abstract
An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33. Abstract
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ. 2006;174(5):635-41. Abstract
Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(2):MR000001. Abstract
Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. Abstract
Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(1):95-100. Abstract
Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: evaluation of three strategies. J Adv Nurs. 2007;57(1):95-100. Abstract
Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(8):755-62. Abstract
Searching the LILACS database could improve systematic reviews in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(8):947-8.
The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):149-57. Abstract
PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):805-7. Abstract
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(6):602-7. Abstract
Searching for randomised controlled trials and clinical controlled trials in Thai online bibliographical biomedical databases. Health Info Libr J. 2011;28(1):68-76. Abstract
Semantically equivalent PubMed and Ovid-MEDLINE queries: different retrieval results because of database subset inclusion. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(8):915-6.
Simple search techniques in PubMed are potentially suitable for evaluating the completeness of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(6):660-5. Abstract