Bibliography

Filters: Keyword is Decision Making, Organizational  [Clear All Filters]
[
Gerhardus A. [The role of HTA in German health care. Do we need impact objectives?]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2006;49(3):233-40. Abstract
U
Luce BR, Brown RE. The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(1):79-92. Abstract
T
Granados A, Borràs JM. Technology assessment in Catalonia: integrating economic appraisal. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(12):1643-6. Abstract
S
Cavazza M, Jommi C. Stakeholders involvement by HTA Organisations: why is so different? Health Policy. 2012;105(2-3):236-45. Abstract
R
Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E, McDonald C, Kearney N. A review of literature about involving people affected by cancer in research, policy and planning and practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(1):21-33. Abstract
P
Kreis J, Schmidt H. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38(1):89-122. Abstract
Blank PR, Schwenkglenks M, Sardos CS, Patris J, Szucs TD. Population access to new vaccines in European countries. Vaccine. 2013;31(27):2862-7. Abstract
I
Oortwijn W, Banta D, Vondeling H, Bouter L. Identification and priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: actors and activities. Health Policy. 1999;47(3):241-53. Abstract
H
Hailey DM. Health technology assessment in Canada: diversity and evolution. Med J Aust. 2007;187(5):286-8. Abstract
Streat S, Munn S. Health economics and health technology assessment: perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Clin. 2012;28(1):125-33, vii. Abstract
D
Chafe R, Neville D, Rathwell T, Deber R. Deciding whether to engage the public on health care issues. Healthc Manage Forum. 2008;21(3):24-8. Abstract
C
Kenyon L, Gordon F. Community engagement: from a professional to a public perspective. Community Pract. 2009;82(2):22-5. Abstract