Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is Humans [Clear All Filters]
PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):805-7. Abstract
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009;91(3):219-28. Abstract
Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38(1):89-122. Abstract
Public engagement in choosing health priorities. CMAJ. 2011;183(2):227.
Priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: principles and practice. Health Policy. 2002;62(3):227-42. Abstract
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9, W64.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
A pragmatic critical appraisal instrument for search filters: introducing the CADTH CAI. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(3):211-9. Abstract
Population access to new vaccines in European countries. Vaccine. 2013;31(27):2862-7. Abstract
Populating decision-analytic models: the feasibility and efficiency of database searching for individual parameters. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):305-11. Abstract
Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):440-8. Abstract
The politics of health technology assessment in Poland. Health Policy. 2012;108(2-3):178-93. Abstract
The pitfalls of a systematic MEDLINE review in palliative medicine: symptom assessment instruments. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(3):181-4. Abstract
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579. Abstract
Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):28. Abstract
Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(3):334-40. Abstract
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129-49. Abstract
Patient-focused HTAs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):273-4.
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):30-5. Abstract
Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):330-6. Abstract
An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:20. Abstract
Overcoming the barriers to greater public engagement. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(1):e1001761.