Bibliography
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is D [Clear All Filters]
Methodological Challenges to Economic Evaluations of Vaccines: Is a Common Approach Still Possible? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(3):245-52. Abstract
Methodological Challenges to Economic Evaluations of Vaccines: Is a Common Approach Still Possible? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(3):245-52. Abstract
Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1192-9. Abstract
Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):152-4. Abstract
Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):152-4. Abstract
Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):152-4. Abstract
Medical technology assessment in Finland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(1):68-76. Abstract
Medical innovation and the critical role of health technology assessment. JAMA. 1999;282(19):1869-72.
Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):708-15. Abstract
Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
Knowledge in health technology assessment: who, what, how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):324-9. Abstract
Italy: Health system review. Vol 11 (6). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. Abstract
"It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1518-26. Abstract
Ireland: Health system review. Vol 11 (4). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. Abstract
Introducing "ERIC", a living research ethics database. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(2):117.
International survey on attitudes toward ethics in health technology assessment: An exploratory study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):50-4. Abstract
An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health. 2013;16(1):155-63. Abstract
An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health. 2013;16(1):155-63. Abstract
International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(1):89-95. Abstract
Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium. J Med Philos. 2001;26(3):245-61. Abstract
Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage, and regulatory processes: emerging issues, goals, and opportunities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(3):253-60. Abstract
Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):369-75. Abstract