Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is D  [Clear All Filters]
M
Jit M, Hutubessy R. Methodological Challenges to Economic Evaluations of Vaccines: Is a Common Approach Still Possible? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(3):245-52. Abstract
Jit M, Hutubessy R. Methodological Challenges to Economic Evaluations of Vaccines: Is a Common Approach Still Possible? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(3):245-52. Abstract
van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1192-9. Abstract
Golder S, Loke YK, Bland M. Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8(5):e1001026. Abstract
Breckenridge A, Woods K, Walley T. Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):152-4. Abstract
Breckenridge A, Woods K, Walley T. Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):152-4. Abstract
Breckenridge A, Woods K, Walley T. Medicines regulation and health technology assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87(2):152-4. Abstract
Kankaanpää J, Linnakko E, Leisti S. Medical technology assessment in Finland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(1):68-76. Abstract
Perry S, Thamer M. Medical innovation and the critical role of health technology assessment. JAMA. 1999;282(19):1869-72.
Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, et al. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
L
Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):708-15. Abstract
Royle P, Waugh N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
K
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Hansen HP. Knowledge in health technology assessment: who, what, how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):324-9. Abstract
I
Lo Scalzo A, Donatini A, Orzella L, Cicchetti A, Profili S, Maresso A. Italy: Health system review. Vol 11 (6). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. Abstract
Gauvin F-, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN. "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1518-26. Abstract
McDaid D, Wiley M, Maresso A, Mossialos E. Ireland: Health system review. Vol 11 (4). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2009. Abstract
Davies HT, Wiseman T. Introducing "ERIC", a living research ethics database. J Med Ethics. 2003;29(2):117.
Arellano LE, Willett JM, Borry P. International survey on attitudes toward ethics in health technology assessment: An exploratory study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):50-4. Abstract
Whitty JA. An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health. 2013;16(1):155-63. Abstract
Whitty JA. An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health. 2013;16(1):155-63. Abstract
Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D, Jun M. International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2012 Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012. Abstract
Draborg E, Gyrd-Hansen D, Poulsen PB, Horder M. International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(1):89-95. Abstract
Reuzel RP, van der Wilt GJ, ten Have HA, de Vries Robbé PF. Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium. J Med Philos. 2001;26(3):245-61. Abstract
Henshall C, Mardhani-Bayne L, Frønsdal KB, Klemp M. Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage, and regulatory processes: emerging issues, goals, and opportunities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(3):253-60. Abstract
Danner M, Hummel MJ, Volz F, van Manen JG, Wiegard B, Dintsios C-, et al. Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):369-75. Abstract