Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is P  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O [P] Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
Private Practice
Ahern F, O'Doherty N. Health technology assessment in Ireland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):449-58. Abstract
Cranovsky R, Schilling J, Faisst K, Koch P, Gutzwiller F, Brunner HH. Health technology assessment in Switzerland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):576-90. Abstract
Principle-Based Ethics
ten Have HA. UNESCO's activities in ethics. Science & Engineering Ethics. 2010;16:7-15. Abstract
Primary Prevention
Sacchini D, Virdis A, Refolo P, Pennacchini M, de Paula IC. Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects. Med Health Care Philos. 2009;12(4):453-7. Abstract
Prevalence
Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, Basch E, Cella D, Reilly CM, et al. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(7). Abstract
Prescription Drugs
Messina J, Grainger DL. A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines. Patient. 2012;5(3):199-211. Abstract
Drummond M, Jönsson B, Rutten F, Stargardt T. Reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing versus health technology assessment. Eur J Health Econ. 2011;12(3):263-71. Abstract
Greiner W, von der Schulenburg J-. HTA in Germany: very special and specific. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11(1):1-3.
Golder S, Loke YK. Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27(3):176-90. Abstract
Prenatal Diagnosis
Hivon M, Lehoux P, Rock M, Denis J-. Health technology assessment and the media: more compatible than one may think? Healthc Policy. 2012;7(4):56-67, 67.e1-7. Abstract
Prenatal Care
Fattal J, Lehoux P. Health technology assessment use and dissemination by patient and consumer groups: why and how? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):473-80. Abstract
Pregnancy
Faisst K, Schilling J, Koch P. Health technology assessment of three screening methods in Switzerland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(3):389-99. Abstract
Jørgensen T, Hvenegaard A, Kristensen FB. Health technology assessment in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):347-81. Abstract
Banta HD. Health policy, health technology assessment, and screening in Europe. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(3):409-17. Abstract
Jonsson E, Banta HD, Schersten T. Health technology assessment and screening in Sweden. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001;17(3):380-8. Abstract
Hivon M, Lehoux P, Rock M, Denis J-. Health technology assessment and the media: more compatible than one may think? Healthc Policy. 2012;7(4):56-67, 67.e1-7. Abstract
Predictive Value of Tests
Rogerson TE, Ladhani M, Mitchell R, Craig JC, Webster AC. Efficient strategies to find diagnostic test accuracy studies in kidney journals. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015;20(8):513-8. Abstract
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Carroll C. Qualitative evidence synthesis to improve implementation of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 2017;356:j80.
Orvain J, Xerri B, Matillon Y. Overview of health technology assessment in France. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):25-34. Abstract
Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A. Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:32. Abstract
Dirksen CD, Utens CM, Joore MA, van Barneveld TA, Boer B, Dreesens DH, et al. Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:64. Abstract
Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):708-15. Abstract
Brouwers MC. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II. AGREE Research Trust; 2009. Abstract
Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(3):548-56. Abstract
Beckles Z, Glover S, Ashe J, Stockton S, Boynton J, Lai R, et al. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):1051-7. Abstract