Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is P  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O [P] Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
Policy Making
McDaid D. Co-ordinating health technology assessment in Canada: a European perspective. Health Policy. 2003;63(2):205-13. Abstract
Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin F-. Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82(1):37-50. Abstract
Chafe R, Neville D, Rathwell T, Deber R. Deciding whether to engage the public on health care issues. Healthc Manage Forum. 2008;21(3):24-8. Abstract
Ciani O, Tarricone R, Torbica A. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems? Health Policy. 2012;108(2-3):194-202. Abstract
Stevens A, Milne R. Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):11-24. Abstract
Lehoux P, Blume S. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25(6):1083-120. Abstract
van den Heuvel WJ, Wieringh R, van den Heuvel LP. Utilisation of medical technology assessment in health policy. Health Policy. 1997;42(3):211-22. Abstract
Meetoo D. The setting of healthcare priorities through public engagement. Br J Nurs. 2013;22(7):372-6. Abstract
Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Demers-Payette O, Boivin A. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(11):2002-9. Abstract
Hansen HP, Draborg E, Børlum Kristensen F. Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making. Patient. 2011;4(3):143-52. Abstract
Strech D, Sofaer N. How to write a systematic review of reasons. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(2):121-6. Abstract
Berg M, van der Grinten T, Klazinga N. Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):35-43. Abstract
Woods K. Health technology assessment for the NHS in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(2):161-5. Abstract
Kreis J, Schmidt H. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2013;38(1):89-122. Abstract
Sacchini D, Virdis A, Refolo P, Pennacchini M, de Paula IC. Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects. Med Health Care Philos. 2009;12(4):453-7. Abstract
Oortwijn W, Banta D, Vondeling H, Bouter L. Identification and priority setting for health technology assessment in The Netherlands: actors and activities. Health Policy. 1999;47(3):241-53. Abstract
Hailey DM. Health technology assessment in Canada: diversity and evolution. Med J Aust. 2007;187(5):286-8. Abstract
Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Abelson J. The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(12):1843-50. Abstract
Cavazza M, Jommi C. Stakeholders involvement by HTA Organisations: why is so different? Health Policy. 2012;105(2-3):236-45. Abstract
Poland
Nizankowski R, Wilk N. From idealistic rookies to a regional leader: the history of health technology assessment in Poland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:156-62. Abstract
Kolasa K, Dziomdziora M, Fajutrao L. What aspects of the health technology assessment process recommended by international health technology assessment agencies received the most attention in Poland in 2008? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(1):84-94. Abstract
Ozieranski P, McKee M, King L. The politics of health technology assessment in Poland. Health Policy. 2012;108(2-3):178-93. Abstract
Poland - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Kolasa K, Wasiak R. Health technology assessment in Poland and Scotland: comparison of process and decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(1):70-6. Abstract
Poland - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract