Bibliography
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is Q [Clear All Filters]
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181. Abstract
How does your searching grow? A survey of search preferences and the use of optimal search strategies in the identification of qualitative research. Health Info Libr J. 2004;21(1):21-32. Abstract
Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:80. Abstract
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435-43. Abstract
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435-43. Abstract
Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):300-10. Abstract
[Health technology assessment in the international context: where does Germany stand? For the "German Scientific Working Group Technology Assessment for Health care"]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999;93(1):33-8. Abstract
[Experiences with and impact of health technology assessment on the German Standing Committee of physicians and patients]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2002;96(2):82-90. Abstract
[Regional HTA work can have a good impact on health care. Good examples form Vastra Gotaland]. Lakartidningen. 2010;107(29-31):1780-3.
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274.
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274.
The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):420-31. Abstract
[The curriculum Health Technology Assessment (HTA)]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(4):297-302. Abstract
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9, W64.
Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):21-9. Abstract
Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7(2):125-33. Abstract
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA. 1993;269(21):2749-53. Abstract
[Short report on the German Health Technology Assessment]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(3):237-8.
Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(2):84-92. Abstract
Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:21. Abstract