Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Title is C  [Clear All Filters]
A B [C] D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
C
García-Altés A, Ondategui-Parra S, Neumann PJ. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(3):300-10. Abstract
Voncina L, Jemiai N, Merkur S, Golna C, Maeda A, Chao S, et al. Croatia: Health system review. Vol 8 (7). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006. Abstract
Croatia - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.
Croatia - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Gupta M. A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9(2):111-21. Abstract
Piso B, Zechmeister I, Geiger-Gritsch S. Criteria for vaccine introduction: results of a DELPHI discussion among international immunisation experts on a stepwise decision-making procedure. Journal of Public Health. 2011;19:73-80. Abstract
Criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme. London: Public Health England; 2013. Abstract
CRD's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD); 2009. Abstract
Hutton J, Trueman P, Henshall C. Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(4):425-32. Abstract
Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Vol CETS No.164. Council of Europe; 1999. Abstract
Levay P, Raynor M, Tuvey D. The contributions of MEDLINE, other bibliographic databases and various search techniques to NICE Public Health Guidance. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2015;10(1).
Golder S, Wright K, Rodgers M. The contribution of different information sources to identify adverse effects of a medical device: a case study using a systematic review of spinal fusion. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2014;FirstView:1-7.
Golder S, Loke YK. The contribution of different information sources for adverse effects data. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(2):133-7. Abstract
Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):127. Abstract
Folb BL, Klem ML, Youk AO, Dahm JJ, He M, Ketchum AM, et al. Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020;108(1):36-46. Abstract
Arellano LE, Reza M, Blasco JA, Andradas E. A content analysis of Health Technology Assessment programs in Latin America. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(4):570-6. Abstract
Ahern E, Thavaneswaran P, Babidge W, Maddern GJ. Consumer perspectives in surgical research and audit. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):337-42. Abstract
McCullough LB, Coverdale JH, Chervenak FA. Constructing a systematic review for argument-based clinical ethics literature: the example of concealed medications. J Med Philos. 2007;32(1):65-76. Abstract
Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Lo B, Field MJ, editors. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2009. Abstract
Atkins S, Lewin S, Smith H, Engel M, Fretheim A, Volmink J. Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: lessons learnt. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:21. Abstract
Salameh J-, McInnes MD, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Frank R, et al. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline. Clin Chem. 2019;65(2):291-301. Abstract
Wieseler B, Wolfram N, McGauran N, Kerekes MF, Vervölgyi V, Kohlepp P, et al. Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data. PLoS Med. 2013;10(10):e1001526. Abstract
Sampson M, de Bruijn B, Urquhart C, Shojania K. Complementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;78:108-15. Abstract
Craven J, Jefferies J, Kendrick J, Nicholls D, Boynton J, Frankish R. A comparison of searching the Cochrane library databases via CRD, Ovid and Wiley: implications for systematic searching and information services. Health Info Libr J. 2014;31(1):54-63. Abstract
Shinichi A. A comparison of searching the Cochrane library databases via CRD, Ovid and Wiley. [in Japanese]. Online Kensaku . 2014;35.