Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Title is F  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E [F] G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
F
Korevaar DA, Hooft L, Askie LM, Barbour V, Faure H, Gatsonis CA, et al. Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative. Clin Chem. 2017;63(8):1331-41.
Golder S, Loke YK. Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;100(2):130-4.
Golder S, Wright K, Rodgers M. Failure or success of search strategies to identify adverse effects of medical devices: a feasibility study using a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2014;3:113. Abstract
Golder S, Wright K, Rodgers M. Failure or success of search strategies to identify adverse effects of medical devices: a feasibility study using a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2014;3:113. Abstract
Judson TJ, Bennett AV, Rogak LJ, Sit L, Barz A, Kris MG, et al. Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the Internet during routine chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(20):2580-5. Abstract
Finding and Using Health Statistics. Bethesda: U.S. National Library of Medicine; 2012. Abstract
Fangerau H. Finding European bioethical literature: an evaluation of the leading abstracting and indexing services. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):299-303. Abstract
Fangerau H. Finding European bioethical literature: an evaluation of the leading abstracting and indexing services. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):299-303. Abstract
DeJean D, Giacomini M, Simeonov D, Smith A. Finding Qualitative Research Evidence for Health Technology Assessment. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(10):1307-17. Abstract
Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B, et al. Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:5. Abstract
Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B, et al. Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:5. Abstract
Information Service. Finding studies for systematic reviews: a resource list for researchers. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2010.
Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, Morton S. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011.
Vuorenkoski L. Finland: Health system review. Vol 10 (4). Mossialos E, Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2008. Abstract
Lehoux P, Poland B, Daudelin G. Focus group research and "the patient's view". Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(8):2091-104. Abstract
Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Demers-Payette O, Boivin A. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(11):2002-9. Abstract
France - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
France - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014. Abstract
Chevreul K, Durand-Zaleski I, Bahrami S, Hernández-Quevedo C, Mladovsky P. France: Health system review. Vol 12(6). Busse R, Figueras J, McKee M, Saltman R, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2010. Abstract
Nizankowski R, Wilk N. From idealistic rookies to a regional leader: the history of health technology assessment in Poland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:156-62. Abstract
Yang B-. The future of health technology assessment in healthcare decision making in Asia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(11):891-901. Abstract