Cost-utility analysis (CUA)

Last revised: 

This sub-division presents a selection of methodological publications on cost-utility-analysis (CUA) and Health Technoogy Assessment (HTA):

  1. Bell CM, Chapman RH, Stone PW, Sandberg EA, Neumann PJ. An off-the-shelf help list: A comprehensive catalog of preference scores from published cost-utility analyses. Med Decis Making 2001; 21(4): 288-294. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  2. Brauer CA, Rosen AB, Greenberg D, Neumann PJ. Trends in the measurement of health utilities in published cost-utility analyses. Value Health 2006; 9(4): 213-218. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  3. de Neeling JND. Cost-utility analysis. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands (GR); 2003. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  4. Dolan P, Shaw R, Tsuchiya A, Williams A. QALY maximisation and people's preferences: A methodological review of the literature. Health Econ 2005; 14(2): 197-208. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  5. Gezondheidsraad. Ethical aspects of cost-utility analysis: 4th Forum of National Ethics Councils in EU Countries, Amsterdam, 22 December 2004. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands (GR); 2005.[Further reference details] [Full text]
  6. Ginsberg GM. Generalizability of cost-utility analyses across countries and settings. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 27(6): 845-852.[Further reference details] [Full text]
  7. Greenberg D, Pliskin JS. Preference-based outcome measures in cost-utility analyses: A 20-year overview. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18(3): 461-466.  [Further reference details] [Full text]
  8. Greenberg D, Rosen AB, Olchanski NV, Stone PW, Nadai J, Neumann PJ. Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: Registry analysis. BMJ 2004; 328(7455): 1536-1537. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  9. Lilford R, Girling A, Braunholtz D, Gillett W, Gordon J, Brown CA, et al. Cost-utility analysis when not everyone wants the treatment: Modeling split-choice bias. Med Decis Making 2007; 27(1): 21-26. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  10. McDonough CM, Tosteson AN. Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: How choice of method may influence decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics 2007; 25(2): 93-106.  [Further reference details] [Full text]
  11. Pickard AS, Wang Z, Walton SM, Lee TA. Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm? Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 11. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  12. Sonnad SS , Greenberg D , Rosen AB, Neumann PJ. Diffusion of published cost-utility analyses in the field of health policy and practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21(3): 399-402. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  13. Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Liljas B, Neumann PJ. Measuring costs in cost-utility analyses: Variations in the literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16(1): 111-124. [Further reference details] [Full text]
  14. Tsuchiya A, Dolan P. The QALY model and individual preferences for health states and health profiles over time: A systematic review of the literature. Med Decis Making 2005; 25(4): 460-467. [Further reference details] [Full text]
Total votes: 10748