Titlesort icon Related Chapters
Appraisal of: Fangerau HC. Finding European bioethical literature: An evaluation of the leading abstracting and indexing services. J Med Ethics 2004; 30 (3): 299–303.
Appraisal of: Droste S, Rixen S. [Information on legal issues in health technologies: methodological proposal to identify them in a systematic and comprehensible manner]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2012;106:509-522. Legal aspects
Appraisal of: Droste S, Dintsios CM, Gerber A. Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010; 26(4): 441–449.
Appraisal of: Droste S, Dintsios C-M. Literature searching for publications used in economic evaluation in health technology assessments: An 8-steps approach to successful health economics information retrieval. Gesundheitsokonomie und Qualitatsmanagement Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Dracos A. SIBIL: uno strumento italiano per il reperimento dell'informazione in bioetica. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2004; 40 (): 283–6.
Appraisal of: Dirnberger D. A guide to efficient keyword, sequence and classification search strategies for biopharmaceutical drug-centric patent landscape searches: A human recombinant insulin patent landscape case study. World Pat Inf 2011; 33(2): 128–1 Legal aspects
Appraisal of: Dakin H. Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2013;11(1):151. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Coyle KB, Trochlil K, Iversen P. MEDLINE and EMBASE for health economic literature reviews [abstract]. Value Health 2012;15(4):A162. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Chapman AL, Morgan LC, Gartlehner G. Semi-automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 27(1):22-7. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Beynon R, Leeflang MM, McDonald S, Eisinga A, Mitchell RL, Whiting P, Glanville JM. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, Issue 9. Diagnostic accuracy
Appraisal of: Belter CW. "A relevance ranking method for citation-based search results." Scientometrics 2017;112(2): 731-746. Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: Banno, M et al (2019) Studies registered in non-ClinicalTrials.gov accounted for an increasing proportion of protocol registrations in medical research. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;116:106.
Appraisal of: Arber M, Garcia S, Veale T, Edwards M, Shaw A, Glanville J. Sensitivity of a search filter designed to identify studies reporting health state utility values [poster].
Appraisal of: Alton V, Eckerlund I, Norlund A. Health economic evaluations: how to find them. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2006; 22(4):512-517. Costs and economic evaluation
Appraisal of: Allison MM. Comparison of CINAHL® via EBSCOhost®, Ovid®, and ProQuest®. J Electron Res Med Lib. 2006;3:31-50. Service providers and search interfaces
Appraisal of: "Yao X, Vella E, Brouwers M. How to conduct a high-quality systematic review on diagnostic research topics. Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;27(1):70-75."
Appraisal of: "Sampson M. Complementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating existing systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 78: 108-115." Value of using different search approaches
Appraisal of: "Rogerson TE, Ladhani M, Mitchell R, Craig JC, Webster AC. Efficient strategies to find diagnostic test accuracy studies in kidney journals. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 Aug;20(8):513-8. " Diagnostic accuracy
Appraisal of: "Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? A review of meta-analyses. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Au
Appraisal of: "Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, Paisley S, Kaltenthaler E. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking." Diagnostic accuracy
Appraisal of: "Pereira RA, Puga MEDS, Atallah AN, Macedo EC, Macedo CR. LILACS search strategy for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Health Info Libr J. 2019 Sep;36(3):223-243."
Appraisal of: "Luhnen M, Prediger B, Neugebauer EAM, Mathes T. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations in health technology assessment: a review of characteristics and applied methods. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018(34);6:537–546."
Appraisal of: "Li L, Smith HE, Atun R, Tudor Car L. Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2019, Issue 3. Art. No.: MR000041. DOI:10.1002/14651858.MR000041.pub2”
Appraisal of: "Korevaar DA, Salameh JP, Vali Y, Cohen JF, McInnes MDF, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM. Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy. Res Synth Methods. 2020 Jan 25."
Appraisal of: "Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PMM. (2015). Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 68(6): 708-715." Diagnostic accuracy