Bibliography
Citizens' perspectives on personalized medicine: a qualitative public deliberation study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(11):1197-201. Abstract
Methods for conducting systematic reviews of risk factors in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:32. Abstract
Health technology assessment-based development of a Spanish breast cancer patient decision aid. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):363-8. Abstract
Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect. 2013;16(2):211-24. Abstract
Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(1):135-44. Abstract
How to write a systematic review of reasons. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(2):121-6. Abstract
Ethical issues in preparing and publishing systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2011;4(2):130-4.
Report from the Technology Assessment Unit of the German Federal Parliament (TAB). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12(4):766-8.
UNESCO Global Ethics Observatory: database on ethics related legislation and guidelines. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(10):738-41. Abstract
A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(1):20-5. Abstract
[Development and institutionalization of Health Technology Assessment in Austria: the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2009;103(6):341-4.
Toward a methodology for moral decision making in medicine. Theor Med. 1991;12(4):281-93. Abstract
Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect. 2013;16(2):211-24. Abstract
Health technology assessment in Latin America and the Caribbean. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:253-4. Abstract
Health technology assessment for the NHS in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(2):161-5. Abstract
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). HTA rhyme and reason? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(2):166-70. Abstract
Health technology assessment in England and Wales. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20(1):11-24. Abstract
Systematic reviews of empirical bioethics. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(6):472-7. Abstract
Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(5):440-8. Abstract
Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(2):84-92. Abstract
Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;100(2):130-4.
Euroethics--a database network on biomedical ethics. Health Info Libr J. 2006;23(3):169-78. Abstract
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies. CMAJ. 2006;174(5):635-41. Abstract