Bibliography

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
H
How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC); 1999. Abstract
P
Glanville J, Kaunelis D, Mensinkai S, Picheca L. Pruning Emtree: does focusing Embase subject headings impact search strategy precision and sensitivity?. Ottawa: CADTH; 2015.
A
Tedford CE, Schott MJ, Flynn JR, Cannon JG, Long JP. A-4, a bis tertiary amine derivative of hemicholinium-3 produces in vivo reduction of acetylcholine in rat brain regions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987;240(2):476-85. Abstract
Access with Evidence Development. HTAi Interest Sub-Group on Conditional Coverage and Evidence Development for Promising Technologies; 2010. Abstract
ACP Clinical Practice Guidelines. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 2012. Abstract
Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research. Vol CETS No.195. Council of Europe; 2007. Abstract
Sampson M, Zhang L, Morrison A, Barrowman NJ, Clifford TJ, Platt RW, et al. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33. Abstract
Snyder L. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(1 Pt 2):73-104. Abstract
Yoshii A, Plaut DA, McGraw KA, Anderson MJ, Wellik KE. Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):21-9. Abstract
Brouwers MC. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II. AGREE Research Trust; 2009. Abstract
Zechmeister-Koss I, Schnell-Inderst P, Zauner G. Appropriate Evidence Sources for Populating Decision Analytic Models within Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Systematic Review of HTA Manuals and Health Economic Guidelines. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(3):288-99. Abstract
Rice DB, Kloda LA, Levis B, Qi B, Kingsland E, Thombs BD. Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? A review of meta-analyses. J Psychosom Res. 2016;87:7-13. Abstract
Goven J. Assessing genetic testing: who are the "lay experts"? Health Policy. 2008;85(1):1-18. Abstract
Drummond M, Tarricone R, Torbica A. Assessing the added value of health technologies: reconciling different perspectives. Value Health. 2013;16(1 Suppl):S7-13. Abstract
Oortwijn WJ, Hanney SR, Ligtvoet A, Hoorens S, Wooding S, Grant J, et al. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment in The Netherlands. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(3):259-69. Abstract
Schumacher I, Zechmeister I. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment on the austrian healthcare system. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(1):84-91. Abstract
Abelson J, Bombard Y, Gauvin F-, Simeonov D, Boesveld S. Assessing the impacts of citizen deliberations on the health technology process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(3):282-9. Abstract
Kwon Y, Powelson SE, Wong H, Ghali WA, Conly JM. An assessment of the efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in identifying studies for a systematic review on ward closures as an infection control intervention to control outbreaks. Syst Rev. 2014;3:135. Abstract
Sandman L, Heintz E. Assessment vs. appraisal of ethical aspects of health technology assessment: can the distinction be upheld? GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014;10:Doc05. Abstract
Basch E, Abernethy AP, Reeve BB. Assuring the patient centeredness of patient-reported outcomes: content validity in medical product development and comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2011;14(8):965-6.
Australia - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Australia - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); 2014.
Healy J, Sharman E, Lokuge B. Australia: Health System Review. Vol 8 (5). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2006.
Whitty JA, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Scuffham PA. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(5):638-54. Abstract
Booth A. Australian supermodel?--A practical example of evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP). Health Info Libr J. 2006;23(1):69-72.