Bibliography
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is M [Clear All Filters]
The history of health technology assessment in Norway. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:148-55. Abstract
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274.
Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274.
Health technology assessment in South Africa--future promise. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(5):286-7.
Evaluating Health Services: A Reporter Covers the Science of Research Synthesis. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund; 2004. Abstract
An uneven spread: a review of public involvement in the National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):343-7. Abstract
A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. Abstract
Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17(9):713-8. Abstract
Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: were theoretical principles achievable in practice? Health Expect. 2013;16(2):211-24. Abstract
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9, W64.
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. Health Policy. 2009;91(3):219-28. Abstract
[Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health]. Acta Med Croatica. 2010;64(5):425-34. Abstract
Health Care Systems in Transition: Switzerland. Dixon A, Mossialos E, editors. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2000.
Health Technology Assessment: managing the introduction and use of medical devices in clinical practice in Italy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009;6(3):251-7. Abstract
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):579. Abstract
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579. Abstract
PubMed is slightly more sensitive but more time intensive to search than Ovid MEDLINE. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice. 2011;(6).
Health technology assessment in Canada: 20 years strong? Value Health. 2009;12 Suppl 2:S14-9.
Health technology assessment in Canada. A decade in review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(3):896-902. Abstract
Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11(1):75-89. Abstract
The setting of healthcare priorities through public engagement. Br J Nurs. 2013;22(7):372-6. Abstract