Bibliography
Filters: Keyword is MEDLINE [Clear All Filters]
WHICH DATABASES SHOULD BE USED TO IDENTIFY STUDIES FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018;34(6):547-54. Abstract
Use of the capture-recapture technique to evaluate the completeness of systematic literature searches. BMJ. 1996;313(7053):342-3.
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(3):234-40. Abstract
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(3):234-40. Abstract
Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(8):755-62. Abstract
Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27(3):176-90. Abstract
Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA. 1993;269(21):2749-53. Abstract
Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: a case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones. Health Info Libr J. 2012;29(1):28-38. Abstract
Search terms and a validated brief search filter to retrieve publications on health-related values in Medline: a word frequency analysis study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(3):479-88. Abstract
Search terms and a validated brief search filter to retrieve publications on health-related values in Medline: a word frequency analysis study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(3):479-88. Abstract
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3:MR000041. Abstract
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9:MR000022. Abstract
Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(9):883-8. Abstract
PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):805-7. Abstract
Patient safety and systematic reviews: finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):452-61. Abstract
An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:20. Abstract
Optimal search strategies for detecting health services research studies in MEDLINE. CMAJ. 2004;171(10):1179-85. Abstract
A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(1):20-5. Abstract
Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(11):1192-9. Abstract
Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:7. Abstract
Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(6):602-7. Abstract