Bibliography
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is M [Clear All Filters]
Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:80. Abstract
Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(4):349-57. Abstract
Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the Internet during routine chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(20):2580-5. Abstract
Burden of a multiple sclerosis relapse: the patient's perspective. Patient. 2012;5(1):57-69. Abstract
PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579. Abstract
The role of economic appraisal in health technology assessment: the Australian case. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(12):1653-62. Abstract
Casuistry as bioethical method: an empirical perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(1):71-81. Abstract
Toward a methodology for moral decision making in medicine. Theor Med. 1991;12(4):281-93. Abstract
Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: an empirical study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):305-12. Abstract
Theoretical and practical problems with wide reflective equilibrium in bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth. 2010;31(2):123-40. Abstract
Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24(4):423-9. Abstract
Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):312-8. Abstract
Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: an empirical study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):305-12. Abstract
Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: a descriptive review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(4):463-9. Abstract
A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9(2):111-21. Abstract
The CIOMS view on the use of placebo in clinical trials. Sci Eng Ethics. 2004;10(1):23-8. Abstract
Wide reflective equilibrium as a method of justification in bioethics. Theor Med Bioeth. 2012;33(5):325-41. Abstract
The need for systematic reviews of reasons. Bioethics. 2012;26(6):315-28. Abstract
Technology assessment in health care in Australia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(1):137-53.
The capture-mark-recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):149-57. Abstract
Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(1):124-31. Abstract
Health technology assessment in Australia: a need to re-focus. J Qual Clin Pract. 1996;16(3):123-9. Abstract
An equity framework for health technology assessments. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(3):428-41. Abstract
Health technology assessment in Denmark: strategy, implementation, and developments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 Suppl 1:94-101. Abstract