Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is U  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T [U] V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Smith CS, Hailey D, Drummond M. The role of economic appraisal in health technology assessment: the Australian case. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(12):1653-62. Abstract
User-Computer Interface
Younger P, Boddy K. When is a search not a search? A comparison of searching the AMED complementary health database via EBSCOhost, OVID and DIALOG. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):126-35. Abstract
Lehoux P. Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):28. Abstract
Seeber F. Patent searches as a complement to literature searches in the life sciences: A 'how-to' tutorial. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2418-28. Abstract
Urinary Tract Infections
Golder S, Glanville J, Ginnelly L. Populating decision-analytic models: the feasibility and efficiency of database searching for individual parameters. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):305-11. Abstract
Urban Population
Lehoux P. Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):28. Abstract
Universities
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(4):510-20. Abstract
Universal Coverage
Ahern F, O'Doherty N. Health technology assessment in Ireland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):449-58. Abstract
Woolf SH, Henshall C. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):591-625. Abstract
Cranovsky R, Schilling J, Faisst K, Koch P, Gutzwiller F, Brunner HH. Health technology assessment in Switzerland. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(2):576-90. Abstract
United States Office of Technology Assessment
Eisenberg JM, Zarin D. Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(2):192-8.
Fernandez AM, Schrogie JJ, Wilson WW, Nash DB. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process. Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc. 1997;2(6):240-53. Abstract
United States Food and Drug Administration
Basch E. Beyond the FDA PRO guidance: steps toward integrating meaningful patient-reported outcomes into regulatory trials and US drug labels. Value Health. 2012;15(3):401-3.
Basch E. Toward patient-centered drug development in oncology. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):397-400.
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Eisenberg JM, Zarin D. Health technology assessment in the United States. Past, present, and future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18(2):192-8.
Sampson M, de Bruijn B, Urquhart C, Shojania K. Complementary approaches to searching MEDLINE may be sufficient for updating systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;78:108-15. Abstract
United States
Sarría-Santamera A, Matchar DB, Westermann-Clark EV, Patwardhan MB. Evidence-based practice center network and health technology assessment in the United States: bridging the cultural gap. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(1):33-8. Abstract
Evans D. Database searches for qualitative research. J Med Libr Assoc. 2002;90(3):290-3. Abstract
Battista RN, Hodge MJ. The development of health care technology assessment. An international perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(2):287-300. Abstract
Whiting P, Westwood M, Beynon R, Burke M, Sterne JA, Glanville J. Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(6):602-7. Abstract
Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, Basch E, Cella D, Reilly CM, et al. Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(7). Abstract
Thomson S, Osborn R, Squires D, Jun M. International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2012 Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, France, Germany, Iceland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2012. Abstract
Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B. Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):9-16. Abstract
Luce BR, Brown RE. The use of technology assessment by hospitals, health maintenance organizations, and third-party payers in the United States. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995;11(1):79-92. Abstract
Eriksen MB, Frandsen TF. The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):420-31. Abstract