Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Title is L  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K [L] M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
L
L’évaluation des aspects éthiques à la HAS. Sambuc C, Thébaut C, editors. Paris: Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS); 2013. Abstract
Lithuania - OECD Countries. Vol 2014. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) City Paris; 2014. Abstract
Lithuania - GHO Country statistics. Vol 2014. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO); 2014. Abstract
Korevaar DA, Cohen JF, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Literature survey of high-impact journals revealed reporting weaknesses in abstracts of diagnostic accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):708-15. Abstract
Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27(2):114-22. Abstract
Royle P, Waugh N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51. Abstract
Finfgeld-Connett D, Johnson DE. Literature search strategies for conducting knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(1):194-204. Abstract
Boeker M, Motschall E, Vach W. Literature search methodology for systematic reviews: conventional and natural language processing enabled methods are complementary (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-9). J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:255-7.
Rosen R, Gabbay J. Linking health technology assessment to practice. Interview by Abi Berger. BMJ. 1999;319(7220):1292.
Pereira RA, Puga ME, Atallah ÁN, Macedo EC, Macedo CR. LILACS search strategy for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36(3):223-43. Abstract
Grossetta Nardini HK, Batten J, Funaro MC, Garcia-Milian R, Nyhan K, Spak JM, et al. Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:23. Abstract
Ong BN. The lay perspective in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12(3):511-7. Abstract