Bibliography

Filters: First Letter Of Title is P  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O [P] Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
P
Seeber F. Patent searches as a complement to literature searches in the life sciences: A 'how-to' tutorial. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2418-28. Abstract
Patient access schemes liaison unit (PASLU). Vol 2012. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011. Abstract
Hansen HP, Lee A, van Randwijk CB. Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):330-6. Abstract
Patient Involvement in Clinical Research: A guide for Patient Organisations and Patient Representatives. Soest (NL): PatientPartner; 2011. Abstract
Tanon AA, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos A-, Pomey M-, Vadeboncoeur A, Nguyen H. Patient safety and systematic reviews: finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(5):452-61. Abstract
Bridges JF, Jones C. Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23(1):30-5. Abstract
Facey KM, Hansen HP. Patient-focused HTAs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27(4):273-4.
Banerjee AK, Okun S, Edwards RI, Wicks P, Smith MY, Mayall SJ, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Safety Event Reporting: PROSPER Consortium guidance. Drug Saf. 2013;36(12):1129-49. Abstract
Basch E, Snyder C, McNiff K, Brown R, Maddux S, Smith ML, et al. Patient-reported outcome performance measures in oncology. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(3):209-11.
Basch E, Bennett AV. Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of rare diseases. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29 Suppl 3:S801-3. Abstract
Facey K, Boivin A, Gracia J, Hansen HP, Lo Scalzo A, Mossman J, et al. Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(3):334-40. Abstract
Lehoux P. Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):28. Abstract
Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. JAMA. 2014.
Harboe I, Desser A, Nordheim L, Glanville J. PD85: Testing search filters to retrieve economic evaluations in Embase. . Int J Technol Assess Health Care.. 2018;34(S1).
Spry C, Mierzwinski-Urban M, Rabb D. Peer review of literature search strategies: does it make a difference?. In: Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA) Conference, 22-25 May 2013. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Canada; 2013.
Spry C, Mierzwinski-Urban M, Rabb D. Peer review of literature search strategies: does it make a difference? . In: 21st Cochrane Colloquium; 19-23 Sep 2013. Quebec, Canada; 2013.
Relevo R, Paynter R. Peer Review of Search Strategies. Methods Research Report. (Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-100572.) . AHRQ Publication No. 12-EHC068-EF ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
Golder S, Loke YK. The performance of adverse effects search filters in medline and embase. Health Info Libr J. 2012;29(2):141-51. Abstract
Arber M, Garcia S, Veale T, Edwards M, Shaw A, Glanville JM. PERFORMANCE OF OVID MEDLINE SEARCH FILTERS TO IDENTIFY HEALTH STATE UTILITY STUDIES. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(4):472-80. Abstract
Huang Y, Yang Z, Wang J, Zhuo L, Li Z, Zhan S. Performance of search strategies to retrieve systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy from the Cochrane Library. J Evid Based Med. 2016. Abstract
Hinde S, Spackman E, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ. PHP117 The Cost-Effectiveness Threshold: The Results of A Novel Literature Review Method. Value in Health. 2011;14(7):A354.
Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):579. Abstract
Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579. Abstract
Messina J, Grainger DL. A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines. Patient. 2012;5(3):199-211. Abstract
O'Leary N, Tiernan E, Walsh D, Lucey N, Kirkova J, Davis MP. The pitfalls of a systematic MEDLINE review in palliative medicine: symptom assessment instruments. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(3):181-4. Abstract